Civil discovery: depositions.
Summary
Existing law authorizes any party to obtain discovery in civil actions by taking the oral deposition of any person, including any party to the action. Under existing law, a deposition examination of the witness by all counsel, other than the witness' counsel of record, is generally limited to 7 hours of total testimony. Existing law provides an exception to the 7-hour limitation for depositions taken in cases designated as complex. In such cases, the deposition examination of a witness by all counsel other than the witness' counsel of record is limited to 2 days of no more than 7 hours of total testimony each day, or 14 hours of total testimony, unless a licensed physician attests that the deponent suffers from an illness or condition that raises substantial medical doubt of the deponent's survival beyond 6 months. This bill would require that, in any civil action for injury or illness that results in mesothelioma or silicosis, a deposition examination of the plaintiff by counsel other than the plaintiff's counsel of record be limited to 7 hours of total testimony if a licensed physician attests in a declaration that the deponent suffers from mesothelioma or silicosis, raising substantial medical doubt of the survival of the deponent beyond 6 months. A party would be authorized by this bill to seek an order permitting up to (1) an additional 3 hours of deposition testimony if more than 10 defendants appear at the deposition, and an additional 7 hours of deposition testimony if more than 20 defendants appear at the deposition. A court would be authorized to grant the additional time only upon a finding that the extension is in the interest of fairness, and a determination that the health of the deponent does not appear to be endangered by the grant of additional time.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Senate Passage
Apr 2019
Assembly Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Aug 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Signed Aug 30, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Apr 8, 2019 · Assembly Aug 12, 2019
How they voted
28–3
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 34
Apr 8, 2019
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican8
37% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
7
Committee
4
Amendments
3
Aug 30, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 15, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2179.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 2666.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jul 5, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Jun 4, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 4).
lower
May 2, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 8, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 4. Page 592.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 553.) (April 2).
upper
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 645
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 645. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline