Financial abuse of elder or dependent adults.
Summary
Existing law, the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, establishes procedures and requirements for the reporting, investigation, and prosecution of elder and dependent adult abuse. Existing law imposes various reporting requirements on mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse, as defined, and imposes a civil penalty for a violation of these provisions. Under existing law, all officers and employees of financial institutions, as defined, are mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse. This bill would expand the category of mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse to include a broker-dealer and an investment adviser, as defined. The bill would authorize a broker-dealer or investment adviser who makes a report to notify any trusted contact person who had previously been designated by the elder or dependent adult of any known or suspected financial abuse, and to temporarily delay a requested disbursement or transaction from an account of an elder or dependent adult or an account to which an elder or dependent adult is a beneficiary if specified conditions are met. The bill would provide a mandated reporter with civil immunity for any notification or temporary disbursement or transaction delay made in good faith and with reasonable care pursuant to these provisions. Existing law makes specified reports, including reports of known or suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult, confidential. Any violation of the confidentiality of these reports is a misdemeanor. This bill would extend that confidentiality to a report of known or suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult by a broker-dealer or investment adviser. By increasing the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law authorizes information relevant to the incident of elder or dependent adult abuse to be given to specified investigators, including, among others, investigators from an adult protective services agency, a local law enforcement agency, and the probate court. This bill would instead require information relevant to the incident of elder or dependent adult abuse to be given to those investigators, and would include an investigator from the Department of Business Oversight among those investigators to whom the information is to be given. Existing law requires a county adult protective services agency to report every known or suspected instance of abuse of an elder or dependent adult, as specified, to law enforcement with jurisdiction over the case and to any public agency given responsibility for investigation in that jurisdiction of cases of elder and dependent adult abuse. Existing law also requires a county adult protective services agency to provide mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult with instructional materials regarding abuse and neglect of an elder or dependent adult and their obligation to report under these provisions. The bill would require a county adult protective services agency to additionally report a known or suspected instance of abuse reported by a broker-dealer or investment adviser and to additionally provide instructional materials to broker-dealers or investment advisers. By increasing the duties of local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Sep 2019
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Signed Sep 6, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2019 · Assembly Aug 15, 2019
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
May 21, 2019
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
11
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Sep 6, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2243.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2728.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jul 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 10).
lower
Jun 18, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 18).
lower
Jun 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 30, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on AGING & L.T.C. and JUD.
lower
May 21, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1179.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 15, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
May 13, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 24, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 799.) (April 23).
upper
Apr 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 712.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Feb 21, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 496
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 496. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline