Subpoenas: service.
Summary
Existing law provides that the process by which the attendance of a witness before a court or magistrate is required in a criminal action is a subpoena, which may be signed and issued by any of specified persons, including courts, district attorneys, and public defenders. A subpoena is required to be substantially in a prescribed form. Existing law authorizes service of a subpoena to be made by delivery of the subpoena to the witness personally, or by mail or messenger. Existing law requires service to be effected when the witness acknowledges receipt of the subpoena to the sender and identifies themselves, as specified. Existing law requires the sender to make a written notation of the identifying information obtained. Existing law makes a failure to comply with a subpoena issued and acknowledged pursuant to these provisions punishable as a contempt. This bill would additionally authorize delivery of a subpoena by electronic mail or facsimile transmission. The bill would specify that delivery of a subpoena pursuant to this provision does not apply to the delivery of a subpoena to a peace officer for events or transactions perceived or investigated in the course of the officer's duties, which is governed by other provisions of law. By applying the punishment of contempt to the failure to comply with a subpoena issued by electronic mail or facsimile transmission, thereby expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law governs the procedures that apply to the issuance of a telegraphic copy of a subpoena for a witness in a criminal proceeding by telegraph or teletype. This bill would repeal those provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Signed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 23, 2019 · Assembly Sep 10, 2019
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
May 23, 2019
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
11
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Oct 12, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2868.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3336.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 6, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Jun 27, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 23, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1276.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 16, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 1100.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 22, 2019
Upper · Passed
April 22 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 624.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 21, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 471
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 471. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline