School safety: school security officers and security guards.
Summary
Under existing law, every school security officer employed by a school district or community college district, and every security guard working on the property of a school district or community college district pursuant to a contract with a private licensed security agency, who works more than 20 hours a week as a school security officer or security guard is required to complete a course of training developed by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services of the Department of Consumer Affairs in consultation with the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. This bill would require school security officers employed by a school district, charter school, county office of education, or community college district, commencing July 1, 2021, and security guards working on the property of a school district, charter school, county office of education, or community college district, to complete that training course regardless of the number of hours worked per week. The bill would require school districts, charter schools, county offices of education, and community college districts to provide the training required for their school security officer employees during regular work hours, except as specified. By imposing additional duties on school districts, charter schools, county offices of education, and community college districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Signed Oct 2, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 23, 2019 · Assembly Sep 10, 2019
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
May 23, 2019
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
12
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Oct 2, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2019
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0)
assembly
Sep 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2786.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3174.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Jun 26, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 20, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HIGHER ED. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Jun 10, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and HIGHER ED.
lower
May 23, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1246.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1098.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 796.) (April 24).
upper
Apr 1, 2019
Upper · Passed
April 10 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 26, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 28, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and ED.
upper
Feb 20, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tom Umberg
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 390
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 390. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline