Probation: eligibility: crimes relating to controlled substances.
Summary
Existing law prohibits granting probation or suspending a sentence for persons convicted of specified crimes relating to controlled substances, including possessing or agreeing to sell or transport opiates or opium derivatives, possessing or transporting cannabis, planting or cultivating peyote, and various crimes relating to forging or altering prescriptions, among other crimes, if the person has previously been convicted of any one of specified felony offenses relating to controlled substances. Existing law also prohibits granting probation or suspending a sentence for persons convicted of specified crimes relating to controlled substances, including possessing for sale or selling 14.25 grams or more of a substance containing heroin and possessing for sale 14.25 grams or more of any salt or solution of phencyclidine or its analogs, among other crimes. This bill would delete various crimes relating to controlled substances, including, but not limited to, the crimes described above, from those prohibitions against granting probation or a suspended sentence. The bill would authorize the remaining prohibitions on probation to be waived by a court in the interests of justice. By making additional persons eligible for probation, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2020
Senate Passage
Jan 2020
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Last action Jul 27, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Jan 27, 2020
How they voted
25–2
Passed · 12 other
Total votes 39
Jan 27, 2020
D
Democratic29
79% Yea
R
Republican10
20% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Jul 27, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 18, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Jan 27, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 25. Noes 2. Page 3153.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jan 23, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 3141.) (January 23).
upper
Jan 15, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 3099.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 6, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Mar 26, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 28, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 20, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 378
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 378. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline