Joint powers agencies: Clean Power Alliance of Southern California: meetings.
Summary
The Joint Exercise of Powers Act authorizes 2 or more public agencies, if each is authorized by their respective legislative bodies, to enter into an agreement to jointly exercise any power common to those 2 agencies. The Ralph M. Brown Act requires that meetings of the legislative body of a local agency, including a joint powers agency, be open and public, with specified exceptions authorizing closed sessions for specified purposes. Existing law authorizes a joint powers agency to authorize, as specified, a designated alternate member of the legislative body of the joint powers agency who is also a member of the legislative body of a local agency member, and who is attending a properly noticed meeting of the joint powers agency in lieu of that agency's regularly appointed member, to attend closed sessions of the joint powers agency. Existing law also authorizes a joint powers agency to authorize, as specified, a member of the legislative body of a member local agency to disclose information obtained in a closed session that has direct financial or liability implications for that local agency to legal counsel of that member local agency for specified purposes or to other members of the legislative body of the local agency present in a closed session, as specified. Existing law requires all information received by the legislative body of the local agency member in a closed session related to the information presented to the joint powers agency in closed session to be confidential. This bill would authorize the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, to adopt a policy or bylaw or include in its joint power agreement a provision that authorizes both (1) a designated alternate member of its legislative body who is not a member of the legislative body of a local agency member, and who is attending a properly noticed meeting of the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, in lieu of a local agency member's regularly appointed member to attend closed sessions of the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, and (2) a designated alternate member of its legislative body, who is not a member of the legislative body of the local agency member, to disclose information obtained in a closed session that has direct financial or liability implications for the local agency member for which the designated alternate member attended the closed session, to legal counsel of the local agency member for specified purposes or to members of the legislative body of the local agency present in a closed session, as specified. The bill would otherwise require all information that is received by a designated alternate member of the legislative body of the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, who is not a member of the legislative body of a local agency member, and that is presented to the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, in closed session, to be confidential. The bill would require the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, to establish policies to prevent conflicts of interest and to address breaches of confidentiality that apply to a designated alternate member who is not a member of the legislative body of a local agency member who attends a closed session of the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, if the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California, or its successor entity, exercises the above-described authority provided by this bill. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2025. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Clean Power Alliance of Southern California.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Sep 2019
Introduced Feb 19, 2019
Signed Sep 5, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2019 · Assembly Aug 15, 2019
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
May 6, 2019
D
Democratic27
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
9
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Sep 5, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2246.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2726.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jul 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Jul 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
May 24, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 956.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 2, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 1, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 903.) (May 1).
upper
Apr 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
April 24 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 28, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 19, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anthony Portantino
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 355
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 355. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline