Ballot measures: local taxes.
Summary
Existing law requires that the ballots used when voting upon a measure proposed by a local governing body or submitted to the voters as an initiative or referendum measure, including a measure authorizing the issuance of bonds or the incurrence of debt, have printed on them a true and impartial statement describing the purpose of the measure. If the proposed measure imposes a tax or raises the rate of a tax, existing law requires the ballot to include in the statement of the measure the amount of money to be raised annually and the rate and duration of the tax to be levied. This bill would exempt from this requirement a measure that imposes or increases a tax with more than one rate or authorizes the issuance of bonds. The bill would instead permit for these types of measures the statement of the measure to include the words "See voter guide for tax rate information." Existing law requires local governments, when submitting for voter approval a bond measure that will be secured by an ad valorem tax, to provide the voters with a statement that includes estimates of the tax rates required to fund the measure. This bill would additionally require for a measure that imposes or increases a tax with more than one rate or authorizes the issuance of bonds, that voters be provided with a statement that includes specified information relating to the tax that will be imposed or increased as a result of the measure. By imposing new duties on local elections officials, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Jan 2020
Introduced Feb 12, 2019
Vetoed Jan 13, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2019 · Assembly Sep 10, 2019
How they voted
28–4
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
May 21, 2019
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican8
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
13
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Jan 13, 2020
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Oct 13, 2019
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 13, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 13, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 12. Page 2919.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 2908.)
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-23-9)
assembly
Sep 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2733.) Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
upper
Sep 9, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 45. Noes 25. Page 3208.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 30).
lower
Jul 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 20, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E. & R. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Jun 18, 2019
Lower · Passed
June 18 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 17, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 3, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
May 21, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 6. Page 1184.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 16, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2. Page 1094.) (May 16).
upper
Apr 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 621.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 21, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 12, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 268
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 268. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline