California Environmental Quality Act: projects funded by qualified opportunity zone funds or other public funds.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes a procedure by which a person may seek judicial review of the decision of the lead agency made pursuant to CEQA. This bill would, until January 1, 2025, establish specified procedures for the administrative and judicial review of the environmental review and approvals granted for projects located in specified counties that are funded, in whole or in part, by specified public funds or public agencies and that meet certain requirements. Because a public agency would be required to comply with those new procedures, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the Judicial Council, by March 31, 2021, to adopt rules of court applicable to an action or proceeding brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the certification or adoption of an environmental review document or the granting of project approvals, including any appeals therefrom, to be resolved, to the extent feasible, within 270 days of the filing of the certified record of proceedings with the court to an action or proceeding seeking judicial review of the lead agency's action related to those projects. The bill would require a party seeking to file an action or proceeding pursuant to CEQA to provide the lead agency and the real party in interest a notice of intent to sue within 10 days of the posting of a certain notice and would prohibit a court from accepting the filing of an action or proceeding from a party that fails to provide the notice of intent to sue. The bill would also require a qualified opportunity fund that finances, in whole or in part, a qualified project to provide, to the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development and upon initial application for a qualified project and every 6 months thereafter, specified information regarding the fund and the qualified opportunity zone in which the project is located. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Fresno, Madera, Merced, Monterey, San Benito, and Stanislaus. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2018
Committee Review
Jul 2020
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 3, 2018
Last action Aug 6, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 23, 2019
How they voted
25–6
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
May 23, 2019
D
Democratic27
62% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Jul 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
July 29 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jul 8, 2019
Lower · Passed
July 8 hearing: Testimony taken. Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 27, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 17, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on L. & E. and NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. & E.
lower
May 23, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 6. Page 1257.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 13, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 29, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 797.) (April 23).
upper
Apr 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 651.) (April 10).
upper
Mar 8, 2019
Upper · Passed
March 20 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jan 16, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on EQ. and JUD.
upper
Dec 3, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Anna Caballero
DDemocratic
Co
Sharon Quirk-Silva
DDemocratic
Co
Steve Glazer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 25
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 25. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline