Family daycare homes.
Summary
Under existing law, the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, the State Department of Social Services licenses and regulates family daycare homes. Under existing law, a small family daycare home, which may provide care for up to 8 children, is considered a residential use of property for purposes of all local ordinances. Existing law authorizes a city, county, or city and county to either classify a large family daycare home, which may provide care for up to 14 children, as residential use of the property or to provide a process for applying for a permit to use the property as a large family daycare home. This bill would instead require a large family daycare home to be treated as a residential use of property for purposes of all local ordinances. Existing law makes void every provision in a written instrument entered into relating to real property that purports to forbid or restrict the conveyance, encumbrance, leasing, or mortgaging of the real property for use or occupancy as a family daycare home for children and every restriction or prohibition in a written instrument as to the use or occupancy of the property as a family daycare home. This bill would also make void an attempt to deny, restrict, or encumber the conveyance, leasing, or mortgaging of real property for use or occupancy as a family daycare home and a restriction related to the use or occupancy of the property as a family daycare home. The bill would prohibit a property owner or manager from refusing to sell or rent, or refusing to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise making unavailable or denying, a detached single-family dwelling, a townhouse, a dwelling unit within a dwelling, or a dwelling unit within a covered multifamily dwelling in which the underlying zoning allows for residential use to a person because that person is a family daycare provider. The bill would require the department to notify applicants for family daycare home licenses that specified housing discrimination remedies are available to a family daycare home provider, family daycare home provider applicant, or person who is claiming that any of these protections have been denied. Existing law prohibits a local jurisdiction from imposing a business license, fee, or tax for the privilege of operating a small family daycare home. This bill would extend that prohibition to large family daycare homes. Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal to adopt building standards and regulations relating to the fire and life safety systems in family daycare provider homes. This bill would require the State Fire Marshal to update those regulations in the next regulation adoption cycle, and every 3 years thereafter to conform to changes in these provisions. The bill would also require the State Fire Marshal to issue guidance on implementing the provisions prior to the publication of regulations, but not later than January 1, 2021, and would authorize guidance to be issued annually thereafter in years when the specified regulations are not updated. The bill would also make technical and conforming changes.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Sep 2019
Introduced Feb 7, 2019
Signed Sep 5, 2019
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2019 · Assembly Aug 19, 2019
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
May 6, 2019
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 5, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2235.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 20, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 19, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2759.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 14, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 14).
lower
Jun 25, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 19, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 30, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and JUD.
lower
May 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 959.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 29, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
April 22 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 8, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 552.) (April 2).
upper
Mar 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 332.) (March 11). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 21, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 7, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 234
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 234. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline