Elections: local voting methods.
Summary
Under existing law, a candidate for nonpartisan office who receives votes on the majority of all ballots cast at a primary election is elected to that office, and the office does not appear on the ballot in the ensuing general election. Existing law prescribes which candidates appear on the ballot in the ensuing general election if no candidate has been elected pursuant to this provision, or if the number of candidates elected at the primary election is less than the total number to be elected to that office. Under existing law, these provisions do not apply to elections to fill certain enumerated offices. This bill would apply these provisions, upon approval by a jurisdiction's voters, to the nomination of officers for general law cities, counties, school districts, community college districts, and county boards of education, except as specified. Existing law provides procedures for the election of candidates for elective offices in cities, counties, and local educational agencies. Existing law specifies the circumstances in which voters in these jurisdictions may elect officers at large or from or by district. Existing law prescribes the length of various terms of office for locally elected officials. This bill would authorize a city, county, or local educational agency to conduct an election using ranked choice voting, in which voters rank the candidates for office in order of preference, as specified. This bill would specify the procedures for conducting an election using ranked choice voting as it applies to both a single-seat election and a multiseat election.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Jan 2020
Introduced Feb 4, 2019
Vetoed Jan 13, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2019 · Assembly Sep 10, 2019
How they voted
27–6
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 28, 2019
D
Democratic27
92% Yea
R
Republican8
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Jan 13, 2020
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Oct 13, 2019
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 13, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 9. Page 2833.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (53-16-5)
assembly
Sep 9, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 56. Noes 18. Page 3185.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 5, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 14, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (August 14).
lower
Jul 8, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
May 28, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 1322.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 23, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 771.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 13, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 4, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 212
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 212. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline