Animal blood donors.
Summary
Existing law prohibits any person from collecting blood from animals, or preparing, testing, processing, storing, or distributing blood or blood component products, as defined, from animals, for retail sale and distribution except in a commercial blood bank for animals that is licensed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture. Existing law requires a commercial blood bank for animals, as a condition of licensing, to document how the animal donor was acquired and to have a written protocol for, among other things, ongoing veterinary care for animals held in blood donor facilities. Existing law exempts all records held by the Department of Food and Agriculture pursuant to these provisions from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act. This bill would modify the definition of a commercial blood bank for animals to include establishments that collect blood not only from "captive closed-colony" animals that are kept, housed, or maintained for the purpose of collecting blood, but also "community-sourced" animals, as defined, that are brought by their owners to the commercial blood bank for animals to have their blood collected. The bill would define "indirect supervision" to have the same meaning as in specified regulations. The bill would require a commercial blood bank for animals to include in its written protocol, which would be required to be consistent with current standards of care and practice for the field of veterinary transfusion medicine, bloodborne pathogen testing for all canine and feline blood donors, as specified, and ongoing veterinary care, including an annual physical exam and vaccination schedule for animals held in a captive closed-colony. The bill would prohibit a commercial blood bank for animals from providing payment to a person who brings a community-sourced animal to the commercial blood bank for the purpose of donating that animal's blood or blood component products, and would impose specified requirements on a commercial blood bank for animals that accepts a donation from a community-sourced animal. The bill would require commercial blood banks for animals to annually submit a specified report to the department. The bill would require the department to submit a specified report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2025. The bill would delete the above-described exemption from the California Public Records Act, except for identifying personal information, as defined, of owners of animal donors, as provided. The bill, for purposes of liability, would declare the production and use of whole blood, plasma, blood products, and blood derivatives for the purpose of injecting or transfusing the same, or any of them, into an animal to be construed to be, and would declare to be, the rendition of a service by each and every person, firm, or corporation participating, and would prohibit from being construed, and would be declared not to be, a sale of that whole blood, plasma, blood products, or blood derivatives. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. Under existing law, a violation of certain provisions of the Food and Agricultural Code relating to animals is a crime. Because a violation of some of the above provisions would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Senate Passage
May 2019
Assembly Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Jan 2020
Introduced Jan 31, 2019
Vetoed Jan 13, 2020
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2019 · Assembly Sep 10, 2019
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
May 21, 2019
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
42
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
5
Jan 13, 2020
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Oct 13, 2019
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 13, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2866.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3263.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time and amended.
upper
Sep 5, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 30).
lower
Jul 8, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 26, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 25).
lower
Jun 13, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and AGRI. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 10, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and JUD.
lower
May 21, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1180.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 15, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
May 13, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 29, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 797.) (April 23).
upper
Apr 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 523.) (April 2).
upper
Mar 13, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on AGRI. and JUD.
upper
Feb 13, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 31, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Scott Wilk
RRepublican
Co
Anna Caballero
DDemocratic
Co
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Co
Tom Lackey
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 202
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 202. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline