SB 1383 California Senate · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Unlawful employment practice: California Family Rights Act.

Summary
Existing law, the Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act, commonly known as the California Family Rights Act, makes it an unlawful employment practice for a government employer or any employer with 50 or more employees, as specified, to refuse to grant a request by an employee, who has at least 1,250 hours of service with the employer during the previous 12-month period, to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period to bond with a new child of the employee or to care for themselves, a child, a parent, or a spouse, as specified. Existing law authorizes an employer to refuse to grant the request if the employer employs less than 50 employees within 75 miles of the worksite where the employee is employed or if the employee is a salaried employee who is among the highest paid 10% of the employer's employees, as provided. Existing law, if both parents of a child are employed by the same employer, authorizes the employer to only grant both employees a total of 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during the 12-month period. Existing law prohibits an employer from refusing to allow a female employee disabled by pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition to take a leave for a reasonable time of up to 4 months before returning to work. Existing law also prohibits an employer from refusing to maintain and pay for coverage under a group health plan for an employee who takes that leave, as specified. The California Family Rights Act specifies that those existing pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition leave provisions are separate and distinct from the protections provided by the California Family Rights Act. Existing law, the New Parent Leave Act, makes it an unlawful employment practice for any employer to refuse to grant a request by an employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period to bond with a new child. The New Parent Leave Act defines employee as a parent who has more than 12 months of service with the employer, who has at least 1,250 hours of service with the employer during the previous 12-month period, and who works at a worksite in which the employer employs at least 20 employees within 75 miles. This bill would expand the California Family Rights Act to make it an unlawful employment practice for any employer with 5 or more employees to refuse to grant a request by an employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period to bond with a new child of the employee or to care for themselves or a child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, spouse, or domestic partner, as specified. The bill would require an employer who employs both parents of a child to grant leave to each employee. The bill would also make it an unlawful employment practice for any employer to refuse to grant a request by an employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected leave during any 12-month period due to a qualifying exigency related to the covered active duty or call to covered active duty of an employee's spouse, domestic partner, child, or parent in the Armed Forces of the United States. The bill would define employee for these purposes as an individual who has at least 1,250 hours of service with the employer during the previous 12-month period, unless otherwise provided.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Senate Passage
Jul 2020
Assembly Passage
Aug 2020
Signed into Law
Sep 2020
Introduced Feb 21, 2020 Signed Sep 17, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Sep 1, 2020

How they voted

This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
44
Key actions
12
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Sep 17, 2020
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2020
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-15-15)
assembly
Aug 31, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 46. Noes 16. Page 5509.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 20, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (August 20).
lower
Jul 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 27, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Jul 2, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 12. Page 3930.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jun 29, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Jun 24, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 8. Page 3829.) (June 24).
upper
Jun 24, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Jun 24, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Jun 23, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended.
upper
Jun 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3771.) (June 18).
upper
May 18, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (May 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 11, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
Mar 12, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 21, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors

Sponsors