Firefighters', police officers', or peace officers' benefit and relief associations.
Summary
Existing law generally provides for the regulation of insurers by the Department of Insurance pursuant to laws set forth in the Insurance Code. Existing law authorizes the Insurance Commissioner to make certain examinations, investigations, and prosecutions and, upon making a determination of the existence of certain conduct, conditions, or grounds, to issue orders reasonably necessary to correct, eliminate, or remedy the conduct, conditions, or grounds. Existing law exempts from the requirements set forth in the Insurance Code firefighters', police officers', and peace officers' benefit and relief associations that comply with specified criteria, including, among other things, a requirement that the membership consist solely of certain state or local peace or law enforcement officers, members of police or fire departments, and emergency medical personnel employed by fire departments, as specified. Existing law prohibits an association from operating or doing business in the state without a certificate of authority. This bill would specify that the laws governing those associations apply only to the extent not preempted by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) . The bill would require an association that holds a certificate of authority and that issues long-term disability or long-term care policies or contracts to submit to the commissioner the opinion of a qualified actuary no later than July 1, 2021, as to whether the reserves and related actuarial items that support the policies or contracts issued are expected to be adequate to satisfy contractual provisions, are based on reasonable assumptions, and are based on specified actuarial standards. The bill would, after the filing of the initial opinion, require those associations to file a new opinion no more than 4 years after the date of its last opinion on file with the commissioner. The bill would require an association seeking a certificate of authority to file an opinion that establishes that it would have adequate resources to provide benefits as required to satisfy its proposed contractual obligations. The bill would prohibit disclosure, as specified, of the information submitted by a company pursuant to these provisions and in the possession or control of the department. The bill would require an association that self-funds all or part of its benefits to include a specified disclosure in all contracts that are not regulated by the department and in certificates evidencing coverage under those contracts. The bill would also require an association that holds a certificate of authority and that issues long-term disability or long-term care policies or contracts to, upon written request from a member, make available to that member the contract for benefits, certificate evidencing coverage, or other plan document that describes the benefits being provided to that member, within 30 days of the request. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Senate Passage
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Aug 2020
Signed into Law
Sep 2020
Introduced Feb 20, 2020
Signed Sep 30, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Jun 11, 2020 · Assembly Aug 30, 2020
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
Jun 11, 2020
D
Democratic28
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Sep 30, 2020
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5282.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 18, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (August 18).
lower
Aug 11, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
July 29 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 18, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Jun 11, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 3678.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Jun 9, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3663.) (June 9).
upper
May 14, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3540.) (May 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 11, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
upper
Mar 5, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 20, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1192
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1192. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline