Land use: accessory dwelling units.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a local agency to ministerially approve or deny a permit application for the creation of an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit within 60 days from the date the local agency receives a completed application if there is an existing single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot. This bill would deem a permit application for the creation of an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit approved if the local agency has not acted upon the completed application within 60 days. (2) Existing law requires ministerial approval of an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed-use zone to create one accessory dwelling unit or one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if certain requirements are met. This bill would instead require ministerial approval of an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed-use zone to create one accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if certain requirements are met. By increasing the duties of local agencies with respect to land use regulations, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Jan 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2019
Last action Jun 23, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 30, 2020
How they voted
69–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 73
Jan 30, 2020
D
Democratic55
94% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican17
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jan 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 3942.)
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (January 23).
lower
Jan 15, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 15, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (January 15). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jan 6, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (January 6). Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Jan 6, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jan 6, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Mar 21, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Phil Ting
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Co
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 953
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 953. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline