Child sexual exploitation: administrative subpoenas.
Summary
Existing law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, generally prohibits a government entity from compelling the production of or access to electronic communication information or electronic device information, as defined, without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, subpoena, or order for a pen register or trap and trace device, except for emergency situations, as defined. The Act does not limit the authority of a government entity to use an administrative subpoena to require a service provider to provide subscriber information, as defined. This bill would, notwithstanding the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, allow a peace officer investigating the sexual exploitation of children to issue an administrative subpoena to require the production of specified information relating to an internet service account, including any internet protocol address or username associated with the account, from a service provider.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Last action Feb 3, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Mar 27, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 25, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tim Grayson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 928
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 928. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline