Protective orders: confidential information regarding minors.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a person who has suffered harassment to seek a temporary restraining order and an order prohibiting the harassment. Existing law authorizes a minor or the minor's legal guardian to petition the court to have information regarding the minor that was obtained while issuing a protective order pursuant to this provision to be kept confidential. Disclosure or misuse of information ordered to be kept confidential is enforced as a civil contempt of court, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000. This bill would require a notice to be sent to the respondent of a petition seeking an order to keep information confidential that identifies the information that has been made confidential and a statement that a disclosure is punishable by a monetary fine. The bill would authorize a court, either on its own motion at any time or upon a petition filed by a person, to grant a disclosure of information ordered to be kept confidential to certain individuals or entities as necessary to prevent harassment or if it is in the best interest of the minor. The bill would require the party who sought to keep the information confidential to be served with a petition to disclose confidential information and afforded an opportunity to object. The bill would authorize the minor's legal guardian who petitioned to keep the information confidential, the party protected by an order issued under the act, or a person who received confidential information to disclose confidential information without a court order under specified conditions. The bill would modify the civil contempt fine for a disclosure or misuse of confidential information to instead authorize a court to impose a sanction of up to $1,000 for a disclosure of confidential information made without a court order, except that the bill would prohibit the court from imposing a sanction upon a minor who alleged harassment. The bill would require a court, before imposing a sanction, to first determine whether a person has, or is reasonably likely to have, the ability to pay a sanction. (2) The Domestic Violence Prevention Act, among other things, authorizes a court, upon a petition by a minor or the minor's legal guardian, to order information regarding the minor obtained while issuing a protective order pursuant to the act to be kept confidential. The act requires the information regarding the minor that is ordered to be kept confidential to be maintained in a confidential case file and prohibits the information from becoming part of the public file in the proceeding or any other civil proceeding. Disclosure or misuse of the confidential information is enforced as a civil contempt of court, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000. This bill would modify the prohibition on the confidential information becoming part of the public file to instead prohibit the information from becoming part of the public file in the proceeding, any other proceeding initiated under the Family Code, or any other civil proceeding. The bill would authorize a court to grant a petition to disclose confidential information, if the court makes certain determinations, and would require the party who sought to keep the information confidential to be served with the petition and afforded an opportunity to object. The bill would authorize the court, at any time and on its own, to authorize a disclosure of any portion of the confidential information to certain individuals or entities if certain conditions are met. The bill would authorize the minor's legal guardian who petitioned to keep the information confidential, the party protected by an order issued under the act, or a person who received confidential information to disclose confidential information without a court order under specified conditions. The bill would modify the civil contempt fine for a disclosure or misuse of confidential information to instead authorize a court to impose a sanction of up to $1,000 for a disclosure of confidential information that is not allowed under the provisions described above, except that the bill would prohibit the court from imposing a sanction upon a minor who alleged abuse, as defined. The bill would require a court, before imposing a sanction, to first determine whether a person has, or is reasonably likely to have, the ability to pay a sanction. (3) The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Assembly Passage
Apr 2019
Senate Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Sep 2019
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Signed Sep 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2019 · Assembly Apr 25, 2019
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 37
Aug 26, 2019
D
Democratic28
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
12
Committee
9
Amendments
5
Sep 12, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2897.).
lower
Aug 27, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2288.).
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 1, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 19, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 29, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 8, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 25, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1362.)
lower
Apr 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Apr 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 27, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 26).
lower
Mar 19, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 4, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TG
Todd Gloria
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 925
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 925. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline