Reproductive health and research: oocyte procurement.
Summary
Existing law prohibits human oocytes or embryos from being acquired, sold, offered for sale, received, or otherwise transferred for valuable consideration for medical research or development of medical therapies, and prohibits payment in excess of the amount of reimbursement of direct expenses to be made to any research subject to encourage an individual to produce human oocytes for the purposes of medical research. Before obtaining informed consent from a subject for assisted oocyte production (AOP) or any alternative method of ovarian retrieval on a subject for the purpose of procuring oocytes for research or the development of medical therapies, existing law requires a physician and surgeon to provide to the subject a standardized medically accurate written summary of health and consumer issues associated with AOP, as specified. Existing law also requires all oocyte extractions for research to be approved by an institutional review board, as defined. This bill, until January 1, 2024, would require individuals who provide human oocytes for research to be compensated for their time, discomfort, and inconvenience in the same manner as other research subjects, as prescribed and determined by a human subject research panel or institutional review board. The bill would establish the Research Participants Undergoing Oocyte Retrieval for Medical Research Purposes Bill of Rights and would require the bill of rights to contain specified information relating to the rights of a research participant providing human oocytes. The bill would require a physician and surgeon to obtain written and oral informed consent prior to providing a procedure for ovarian retrieval, including a signed acknowledgment of the bill of rights. The bill would require the institutional review board to disregard the amount of compensation paid to an individual providing human oocytes for fertility if certain requirements are met, including that the individual in fertility treatment does not want or need the oocytes for their own reproductive success. The bill would require an institutional review board to require any research program or project that comes under its review that involves AOP or any alternative method of oocyte retrieval to inform the research participant that ongoing studies are necessary to assess the long-term health impacts of ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval. The bill would require a research program that offers compensation to research participants providing human oocytes, on or before January 16, 2023, to provide aggregated deidentified information to the Legislative Analyst regarding the research participants, including, among other things, the number of candidates and participants in the program, and basic demographic information and clinical data about the candidates and participants. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst to compile the information received by the research programs and, on or before March 17, 2023, to prepare and submit a report to the Legislature containing the aggregated deidentified information. The bill would change references in existing law that refer to an individual who provides human oocytes for research as a "subject" to "research participant."
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Signed Oct 13, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2019 · Assembly May 20, 2019
How they voted
26–3
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 37
Sep 11, 2019
D
Democratic28
85% Yea
R
Republican9
33% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
9
Committee
4
Amendments
5
Oct 13, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 3486.).
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 4. Page 2857.).
upper
Sep 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 12).
upper
May 29, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
May 20, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 1720.)
lower
Apr 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 9).
lower
Mar 4, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Autumn R. Burke
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 922
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 922. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline