Medi-Cal: dispute resolution.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services, including specialty mental health services and nonspecialty mental health services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law requires the department to implement managed mental health care for Medi-Cal beneficiaries through contracts with county mental health plans. Under existing law, the county mental health plans are responsible for providing specialty mental health services to eligible Medi-Cal beneficiaries, and Medi-Cal managed care plans deliver nonspecialty mental health services to those persons. Existing law requires county mental health plans and Medi-Cal managed care plans to be governed by various guidelines, including network adequacy standards and a requirement that a county mental health plan that provides Medi-Cal specialty mental health services enter into a memorandum of understanding with a Medi-Cal managed care plan that provides Medi-Cal health services to some of the same Medi-Cal recipients served by the county mental health plan. Existing regulations provide for a dispute resolution process to be used to resolve matters between a Medi-Cal managed care plan and a county mental health plan. This bill would require a county mental health plan and Medi-Cal managed care plan that are unable to resolve a dispute to submit a request for resolution to the department. The bill would require the department to issue a written decision to the plans within 30 calendar days from receipt of the request by either the county mental health plan or the Medi-Cal plan. The bill would also prohibit the dispute from delaying the provision of medically necessary services, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Assembly Passage
Jan 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Last action Aug 5, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 30, 2020
How they voted
69–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 73
Jan 30, 2020
D
Democratic55
94% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican17
94% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Aug 5, 2020
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jan 30, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 3941.)
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (January 23).
lower
Jan 15, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 14, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 7, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 4, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JW
Jim Wood
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 910
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 910. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline