Public property: safe parking program.
Summary
Existing law requires a local agency to make an inventory of all lands held, owned, or controlled by the local agency or any of its departments. Existing law authorizes a local agency, or any of its departments, to lease, sell, or grant real property found to be in excess of its foreseeable needs. This bill would require a city or a county with a population greater than 330,000, in coordination with other entities, as specified, to establish a safe parking program that provides safe parking locations and options for individuals and families living in their vehicles. The bill would require a safe parking program to provide a bathroom facility and onsite security, among other requirements. The bill would exempt a city or a county that has a specified safe parking program administered by a nongovernmental entity operating in its jurisdiction from these requirements. The bill would require the safe parking programs be developed and implemented by June 1, 2022. The bill would encourage cities and counties to review the Department of General Services' internet website for the availability of surplus state property and the Department of Transportation's internet website for the availability of excess land that could be used for a safe parking program. The bill would also grant a city or county that establishes a safe parking program immunity from civil liability for an employee's good faith act or omission that fails to prevent an injury to a person participating in the program that occurs in, or in close proximity to, a safe parking program location. The bill would limit this immunity by making the immunity inapplicable to gross negligence, intentional misconduct, or violations of other provisions of law. The bill would repeal those provisions on June 1, 2027. By requiring certain cities and counties to create safe parking programs, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Vetoed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2019 · Assembly May 24, 2019
How they voted
28–8
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 37
Sep 10, 2019
D
Democratic28
96% Yea
R
Republican9
77% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
8
Jan 21, 2020
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 12, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 57. Noes 18. Page 3410.).
lower
Sep 10, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 10. Page 2748.).
upper
Sep 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Jul 8, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 24, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 17. Page 1975.)
lower
May 17, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 17, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 16).
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 23, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 22, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96(a).
lower
Apr 8, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
Apr 4, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on A. & A.R. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
Mar 26, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 4, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and A. & A.R.
lower
Feb 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Autumn R. Burke
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 891
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 891. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline