Juveniles: dependency: judicial caseloads.
Summary
Existing law requires the juvenile court to appoint counsel for a child or nonminor dependent in dependency proceedings if the child or nonminor dependent is not represented by counsel, unless the court determines that there would be no benefit from the appointment of counsel. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to promulgate rules of court that, among other things, establish caseload standards for appointed counsel. This bill would require, by January 1, 2021, the State Department of Social Services, in consultation with the Judicial Council, to convene a stakeholder group to make recommendations by January 1, 2022, related to juvenile dependency proceedings.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Vetoed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2019 · Assembly May 24, 2019
How they voted
37–0
Passed
Total votes 37
Sep 10, 2019
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
13
Committee
9
Amendments
8
Jan 21, 2020
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 12, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3400.).
lower
Sep 10, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2738.).
upper
Sep 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 8).
upper
Jul 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUMAN S. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 26, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUMAN S.
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 24, 2019
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-3)
assembly
May 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1945.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
Apr 10, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 26, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 20, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 4, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 859
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 859. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline