Eligible employers: personal services contracts.
Summary
Existing law permits state agencies to enter into personal services contracts with firms when certain conditions are met. These conditions include requiring a state agency that enters into a personal services contract for janitorial and housekeeping services, custodians, food service workers, laundry workers, window cleaners, and security guards to include provisions for employee wages that are valued at least 85% of the state's cost of wages provided to state employees performing similar duties. Existing law provides for criminal and civil penalties for violations of specified statutes regarding payment of wages. This bill would require the Department of Industrial Relations to, by January 1, 2021, and annually thereafter, identify employers with a market capitalization of at least $1,000,000,000. The bill would require an eligible employer that enters into a personal services contract, as defined, on or after January 1, 2021, to provide the employees who will perform that contract with specified information regarding the employees' right to form or assist labor organizations as provided for by federal law. This bill would define terms for purposes of these provisions. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
died
2 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
May 2019
Assembly Failed
Jan 2020
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2019
Last action Feb 3, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2020
How they voted
34–23
Failed · 16 other
Total votes 73
Jan 27, 2020
D
Democratic55
61% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican17
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Jan 27, 2020
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (34-23-16)
assembly
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (January 23).
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 22, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 21, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 28, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 21, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Levine
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 790
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 790. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline