Police: use of force.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a peace officer to use reasonable force to effect the arrest, to prevent escape, or to overcome resistance. Existing law requires law enforcement agencies to maintain a policy on the use of force, as specified. Existing law requires the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to implement courses of instruction for the regular and periodic training of law enforcement officers in the use of force. This bill would prohibit the use of kinetic energy projectiles or chemical agents, as defined, by any law enforcement agency to disperse any assembly, protest, demonstration, or other gathering of persons, except in compliance with specified standards set by the bill, and would prohibit their use solely due to a violation of an imposed curfew, verbal threat, or noncompliance with a law enforcement directive. The bill would prohibit the use of chloroacetophenone tear gas or 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile gas by law enforcement agencies to disperse any assembly, protest, demonstration, or other gathering of persons. The bill would include in the standards for the use of kinetic energy projectiles and chemical agents to disperse gatherings the requirement that, among other things, those weapons only be fired at a specific target who presents a clear and imminent threat to themselves, the officers, or other persons. The bill would make these provisions inapplicable within a state prison facility. Existing law requires specified law enforcement agencies, by no later than January 1, 2021, to maintain a policy on the use of force that meets specified requirements. This bill would require those agencies, by no later than January 1, 2022, to include in those policies specified guidelines relating to deployment at assemblies, protests, demonstrations, and similar gatherings of people. Existing law requires each law enforcement agency to annually report specified use of force incidents to the Department of Justice and requires the Department of Justice to annually publish a summary of those incidents, as specified. The bill would also require each law enforcement agency, beginning on January 1, 2023, to report any incident in which a kinetic energy projectile or chemical agent is used against a person resulting in a reported injury. The bill would require those agencies, commencing on March 31, 2024, to annually publish a report on their use of kinetic energy projectiles and chemical agents. The bill would require a city in which federal law enforcement is operating to request that the federal law enforcement agency refrain from the use of kinetic energy projectiles or chemical agents to disperse any assembly, protest, demonstration, or other gathering, except as specified in the standards. By imposing new duties on law enforcement agencies and cities, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Assembly Passage
Jan 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 3, 2018
Last action Sep 1, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2020
How they voted
71–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 73
Jan 27, 2020
D
Democratic55
96% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican17
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
10
Committee
14
Amendments
4
Aug 25, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 20, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 20, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 20).
upper
Aug 17, 2020
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 8, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 17, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3888.)
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (January 23).
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jan 8, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 7, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Apr 29, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing for testimony only.
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
Measure version as amended on April 22 corrected.
lower
Apr 23, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Mar 5, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Jan 17, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Dec 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.
lower
0 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 66
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 66. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline