Wellness programs.
Summary
(1) Existing federal law, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) , enacted various health care coverage market reforms that took effect January 1, 2014. Among other things, PPACA sets forth various requirements related to wellness programs, which encompass programs of health promotion or disease prevention. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (department) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of various insurers by the Department of Insurance, headed by the Insurance Commissioner. This bill would prohibit health care service plans and insurers from sharing any personal information or data collected through a wellness program, except as specified, and would prohibit health care service plans or insurers from taking any adverse action, as defined, against an enrollee or member, or insured (individual) , if the action of the health care service plans or insurers is in response to an individual's election to not participate in a wellness program. The bill would establish and impose upon health care service plans and insurers various requirements related to a wellness program, such as requiring a health care service plan or insurer to post a written explanation that is reasonably likely to be understood by an individual on its internet website concerning its policies and practices pertaining to wellness programs, as specified. The bill would require a health care service plan or insurer, for purposes of administering and operating a wellness program, to limit its collection, dissemination, retention, and use of any personal information of an individual to only information that is reasonably necessary to operate a wellness program, except as specified, and would extend various requirements, to the extent that they are applicable, to any entity that the health care service plan or insurer contracts with for purposes of administering or operating a wellness program on their behalf. The bill would authorize the commissioner to assess penalties on an insurer for any violation of these provisions, as specified. Because a willful violation of these requirements relative to health care service plans would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law establishes the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, headed by the Labor Commissioner, within the Department of Industrial Relations, for the purpose of enforcing labor laws, including those relating to employer retaliation. This bill would, among other things, prohibit an employer from requiring an employee to participate in a wellness program as a condition of employment and from taking any adverse action, as defined, against an employee if the action is in response to an employee's election to not participate in a wellness program. The bill would establish and impose upon an employer various requirements related to a wellness program, such as requiring an employer to post a written explanation that is reasonably likely to be understood by an employee on its internet website concerning its policies and practices pertaining to a wellness program. The bill would require an employer, for purposes of administering and operating a wellness program, to limit its collection, dissemination, retention, and use of any personal information of an employee to only information that is reasonably necessary for the program's operation, except as specified, and would extend various requirements, to the extent that they are applicable, to any entity that the employer contracts with for purposes of administering or operating a wellness program on their behalf. The bill would grant an employee various rights in relation to a wellness program, such as obtaining a copy of the employee's records, including personal information that has been collected by the employer as part of a wellness program. The bill would make a violation of these requirements an infraction, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Jan 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2019
Last action Jun 23, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 27, 2020
How they voted
38–19
Passed · 16 other
Total votes 73
Jan 27, 2020
D
Democratic55
69% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican17
94% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jan 27, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 41. Noes 21. Page 3911.)
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jan 23, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (January 23).
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 4, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 28, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 27, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 10. Noes 3.) (March 26).
lower
Mar 13, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Mar 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and L. & E.
lower
Feb 19, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Adrin Nazarian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 648
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 648. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline