Escrow agents: asset requirements.
Summary
Existing law, the Escrow Law, requires people engaging in business as escrow agents to be organized as corporations for that purpose, as specified, and appropriately licensed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight. Existing law requires an escrow agent licensed on or after January 1, 1986, to maintain a tangible net worth of $50,000, including liquid assets of at least $25,000 in excess of current liabilities. Existing law requires an escrow agent licensed before January 1, 1986, to maintain a tangible net worth pursuant to a prescribed schedule, the amounts of which, in 1993, matched those required for escrow agents licensed on and after that date. Existing law provides criminal penalties for willful violations of the Escrow Law. This bill would delete the tangible net worth schedule for escrow agents licensed before January 1, 1986, as described above, and eliminate distinctions based on when an agent was licensed in this context. The bill would exclude a liability derived from an operating lease obligation from a licensee's current liabilities for purposes of establishing tangible net worth.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Assembly Passage
Apr 2019
Senate Passage
Aug 2019
Vetoed
Sep 2019
Introduced Feb 7, 2019
Vetoed Sep 9, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Aug 26, 2019 · Assembly Apr 25, 2019
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 37
Aug 26, 2019
D
Democratic28
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 11, 2019
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2892.).
lower
Aug 27, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2288.).
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 24, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 5, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 8, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Apr 25, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1360.)
lower
Apr 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Apr 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 15, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 8, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sharon Quirk-Silva
DDemocratic
Co
John M. W. Moorlach
RRepublican
Co
Kevin Mullin
DDemocratic
Co
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 412
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 412. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline