Vehicles: motor vehicle sideshows.
Summary
Existing law makes it a crime to engage in a motor vehicle speed contest on a highway, reckless driving on a highway, reckless driving in an offstreet parking facility, or an exhibition of speed on a highway. Existing law allows a peace officer to arrest a person and seize the motor vehicle of the person if the peace officer determines that the person was engaged in these activities. Existing law allows a vehicle seized for these purposes to be impounded for up to 30 days. This bill would make it a crime, subject to specified penalties, to actively participate in, or aid or abet, a motor vehicle sideshow, defined as an event in which 2 or more persons block or impede traffic on a highway or other public place open to vehicle traffic, or access private property without the consent of the owner, operator, or agent thereof, for the purpose of performing motor vehicle stunts, motor vehicle speed contests, motor vehicle exhibitions of speed, or reckless driving, for spectators. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a magistrate presented with an affidavit of a peace officer establishing reasonable cause to believe that a vehicle was an instrumentality used in the peace officer's presence in a motor vehicle sideshow to issue a warrant or order authorizing a peace officer to immediately seize and cause the removal of the vehicle. The bill would allow the vehicle to be impounded for a period not to exceed 30 days, subject to a poststorage hearing, as provided. The bill would also allow the vehicle to be released prior to the conclusion of the 30-day impoundment period without the need to obtain authorization from the magistrate under certain circumstances, as provided. The bill would make it a misdemeanor for a legal owner who gains possession of the vehicle to release the vehicle to a registered owner prior to the 30-day impoundment period, as specified. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 7, 2019
Last action Feb 3, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Apr 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 23, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 25, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 21, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and PUB. S.
lower
Feb 8, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Adrin Nazarian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 410
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 410. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline