Parking and zoning: bicycle and car-share parking credits.
Summary
Existing law, known as the Density Bonus Law, requires a city or county to provide a developer that proposes a housing development within the jurisdictional boundaries of that city or county with a density bonus and other incentives or concessions for the production of lower income housing units, or for the donation of land within the development, if the developer agrees to construct a specified percentage of units for very low income, low-income, or moderate-income households or qualifying residents and meets other requirements. Existing law provides for the calculation of the amount of density bonus for each type of housing development that qualifies under these provisions. Existing law also permits variances to be granted from the parking requirments of a zoning ordinance under certain circumstances. This bill would require a local agency, as defined, to allow an applicant for a housing development project to reduce the number of motor vehicle parking spaces that they would otherwise be required to provide based on the number of long-term bicycle parking spaces and car-sharing spaces provided subject to certain limitations, as specified. The bill would provide that a parking reduction allowed pursuant to these provisions does not reduce or increase the number of incentives or concessions to which the applicant is otherwise entitled under a specified provision of the Density Bonus Law. The bill would include findings that this act addresses a matter of statewide concern and shall apply equally to all cities and counties in this state, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2020
Last action Jun 23, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 8, 2020
How they voted
54–13
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 75
Jun 8, 2020
D
Democratic58
86% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican16
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 8, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 57. Noes 13. Page 4701.)
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (June 2).
lower
May 18, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 14, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 13, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 12).
lower
Mar 9, 2020
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 22, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 21, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert Rivas
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 3153
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 3153. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline