Public employment: labor relations: release time.
Summary
Existing law, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, the Trial Court Employment Protection and Governance Act, the Trial Court Interpreter Employment and Labor Relations Act, Judicial Council Employer-Employee Relations Act, and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Transit Employer-Employee Relations Act, as well as provisions commonly referred to as the Educational Employment Relations Act and the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, regulates the labor relations of the state, the courts, and specified local public agencies and their employees. Existing law establishes other requirements relating to labor relations that are applicable to specified transit agencies. These acts grant specified public employees the right to form, join, and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their choosing and require public agency employers, among other things, to meet and confer with representatives of recognized employee organizations and exclusive representatives on terms and conditions of employment. These acts generally require the public entities in this context to grant employee representatives of recognized employee organizations reasonable time off without loss of compensation or benefits for certain purposes in connection with labor relations, commonly referred to as release time. This bill would prescribe requirements relating to release time that would apply to all of the public employers and employees subject to the acts described above and would generally repeal the provisions relating to release time in those acts. The bill would require these public employers to grant a reasonable number of employee representatives of the exclusive representative reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits for specified activities. This requirement would apply to activities to investigate and process grievances or otherwise enforce a collective bargaining agreement or memorandum of understanding; to meet and confer or meet and negotiate with the public employer on matters within the scope of representation, including preparation for the activities specified in these provisions; to testify or appear as the designated representative of the exclusive representative in conferences, hearings, or other proceedings before the Public Employment Relations Board or similar bodies, as specified; to testify or appear as the designated representative of the exclusive representative before the governing body of the public employer, or a personnel, civil service, or merit commission, among others, and to serve as a representative of the exclusive representative for new employee orientations. The bill would require the exclusive representative to provide reasonable notice requesting an absence in this connection. The bill would specify that its provisions prescribe minimum release time rights and would prescribe requirements regarding the relation of its provisions to other labor agreements that address release time. The bill would prohibit the Public Employment Relations Board from enforcing these provisions with regard to public transit workers that are not otherwise subject to the board's jurisdiction.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Oct 2019
Introduced Jan 30, 2019
Vetoed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2019 · Assembly May 23, 2019
How they voted
25–8
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
Sep 11, 2019
D
Democratic26
96% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Jan 21, 2020
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 12, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 64. Noes 12. Page 3480.).
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 2822.).
upper
Sep 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Jul 8, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 16. Page 1862.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (May 16).
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 23, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 18, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 11, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
lower
Jan 31, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Rob Bonta
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 314
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 314. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline