Telecommunications: universal service: lifeline program.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations. The Moore Universal Telephone Service Act establishes the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service program (lifeline program) in order to provide low-income households with access to affordable basic residential telephone service. Existing law requires the commission, by January 15, 2017, to adopt a "portability freeze" rule for the lifeline program, which requires lifeline program participants to remain with the same lifeline program service provider for a specified time period in order to remain in the program, except as specified, and requires the commission to consider including in the rule a 60-day duration for the portability freeze. This bill would require the commission, on or before July 1, 2021, to update the portability freeze rule, and would require the commission to include in the updated rule a 6-month duration, rather than a 60-day duration, of the portability freeze. The bill would require the commission, on or before July 1, 2021, to adopt updated rules for the lifeline program that include, among other things, a modified recertification process and other changes relating to enrollment, participation, and renewal in the program, as specified. The bill would require that the commission authorize only commission-approved telephone corporations to provide service using lifeline program funding. The bill would require the commission, before July 1, 2022, to determine whether to permit a lifeline telephone service subscriber to have an additional lifeline subscription for broadband services. The bill would require the commission to annually report to the Legislature on the implementation of those updated rules and lifeline participation and renewal levels by ZIP Code until specified participation goals are achieved. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2020
Last action Jun 3, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Jun 3, 2020
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 5, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 24, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on C. & C.
lower
Feb 22, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 21, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eduardo Garcia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 3079
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 3079. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline