Wiretapping: authorization.
Summary
Existing law establishes a procedure for a prosecutor to apply for, and the court to issue, an order authorizing law enforcement to intercept a wire or electronic communication. Existing law requires the Attorney General to prepare and submit an annual report to the Legislature, the Judicial Council, and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts regarding these interceptions, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions punishable as a misdemeanor or as a felony. Existing law makes these provisions effective until January 1, 2020. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2025. By extending the operation of provisions of law creating a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Jan 29, 2019
Signed Oct 8, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2019 · Assembly May 28, 2019
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
Sep 9, 2019
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Oct 8, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2711.).
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Jul 8, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 28, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2021.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
Mar 20, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 304
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 304. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline