Correctional facilities: gassing.
Summary
Existing law defines the act of "gassing," in part, as intentionally throwing human excrement or other bodily fluids at another person, resulting in actual contact with the person's skin or membranes. Existing law makes it a crime of aggravated battery for any person confined in a local detention facility or the state prison to commit a battery by gassing upon the person of a peace officer or employee of the local detention facility or the state prison. Existing law prescribes a procedure by which a law enforcement employee who comes into contact with the bodily fluids of an inmate may request that the inmate be tested for HIV and hepatitis, subject to specified criteria and procedures. This bill would authorize an officer or employee who is the victim of a reported or suspected gassing attack to request that the inmate involved with the attack be tested for hepatitis and tuberculosis, as specified. The bill would require a state prison facility and a county jail to make protective gear, such as clothing, goggles, and shields, readily available to staff. The bill would also require a state prison facility and a county jail to provide adequate training to officers on how to prevent and mitigate the harm from gassing attacks, as specified, and to replace any article of an officer's uniform that has been soiled in a gassing attack. The bill would require a state prison facility and a county jail to complete investigations of gassing attacks within 6 months of the violation, as specified. Existing law authorizes an inmate of a correctional institution to request testing for HIV or hepatitis B or C of another inmate of that institution if the inmate has reason to believe that the inmate has come into contact with the bodily fluids of the other inmate. This bill would authorize a person sentenced to a state prison or county jail to receive an examination for HIV or hepatitis B or C if the inmate has been exposed to the bodily fluids of another inmate. The bill would require the warden of a state prison and the county sheriff or administrator of a county jail to post a notice relating to the rights of a victim of a gassing attack and to provide a notice to an officer, employee, or inmate of the facility or jail who is the victim of the attacks, informing them of their rights. The bill would also require a state prison and a county jail to document specified information relating to those attacks. By creating new duties for sheriffs and county jail administrators, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
Apr 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Oct 2019
Introduced Jan 28, 2019
Vetoed Oct 13, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2019 · Assembly Apr 22, 2019
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
Sep 10, 2019
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican8
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Jan 21, 2020
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 13, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3378.).
lower
Sep 10, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2773.).
upper
Sep 4, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Jul 1, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 17, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11).
upper
May 28, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 1, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1251.)
lower
Apr 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 3).
lower
Mar 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 7, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 29, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 294
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 294. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline