State Highway Route 710.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides, notwithstanding any other law, for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, that the preliminary project alternative referred to as Alternative F-6 in the December 2012 Alternative Analysis Report of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority is no longer deemed to be a feasible alternative for consideration in any state environmental review process for the Interstate 710 North Gap Closure project. This bill would revise this provision to instead provide that the preliminary project alternatives referred to as Alternative F-5, F-6, and F-7 in the December 2012 Alternative Analysis Report of the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority and any other freeway or tunnel alternatives to close the Interstate 710 North Gap are no longer deemed to be feasible alternatives for consideration in any environmental review process for the Interstate 710 North Gap Closure project. (2) Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with full possession and control of all state highways and associated property. Existing law designates and describes state highway routes, and also describes the state highway routes in the California freeway and expressway system, including all of Route 710 in the County of Los Angeles. This bill would, on January 1, 2024, remove from the California freeway and expressway system the portion of Route 710 between Alhambra Avenue in the City of Los Angeles and California Boulevard in the City of Pasadena.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Dec 3, 2018
Signed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 14, 2019 · Assembly May 28, 2019
How they voted
31–4
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 37
Sep 14, 2019
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican9
44% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
12
Committee
6
Amendments
7
Oct 12, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 58. Noes 6. Page 3614.).
lower
Sep 14, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 14, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 32. Noes 4. Page 2958.).
upper
Sep 5, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Sep 4, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 19, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 9).
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
May 28, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 57. Noes 13. Page 2007.)
lower
May 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1775.)
lower
May 13, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1615.)
lower
Apr 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 26, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jan 17, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Dec 4, 2018
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Co
Anthony Portantino
DDemocratic
Co
Cristina Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Laura Friedman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 29
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 29. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline