Hazardous emissions and substances: schoolsites: private and charter schools.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA prohibits an environmental impact report or negative declaration from being approved for any project involving the purchase of a schoolsite or the construction of a new elementary or secondary school by a school district unless specified conditions are met, relating to, among other things, whether the property is located on a former hazardous waste disposal site or solid waste disposal site, a hazardous substances release site, or a site that contains a pipeline that carries specified substances, and the property's proximity to facilities that might reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous air emissions or handle hazardous or extremely hazardous materials, substances, or waste, as provided. This bill would additionally prohibit an environmental impact report or negative declaration from being approved for any project involving the purchase of a schoolsite or the construction of a new elementary or secondary school by a charter school, unless those same conditions are met. By imposing new requirements on charter schools, lead agencies, cities, and counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law prohibits the governing board of a school district from approving a project for the acquisition of a schoolsite, unless specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the school district, as the lead agency, determines that the property to be purchased or built upon is not the site of a former hazardous waste disposal site or solid waste disposal site, a hazardous substances release site, or a site that contains a pipeline that carries specified substances, and that the school district, as the lead agency, has not identified specified facilities within one-fourth mile of the proposed schoolsite that might reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous air emissions or handle hazardous or extremely hazardous materials, substances, or waste, as provided. This bill would additionally impose that prohibition on the governing body of a charter school and would require the determination and identification described above to be made by the lead agency. The bill would impose that prohibition, and related requirements, additionally on a private school. By imposing new requirements on cities and counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Jul 2020
Assembly Passage
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2020
Last action Jul 16, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 10, 2020
How they voted
58–4
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 72
Jun 10, 2020
D
Democratic55
98% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican16
25% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Jul 1, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 10, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 4. Page 4773.)
lower
Jun 3, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 3).
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 14, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 14, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 24, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 22, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 21, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2882
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2882. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline