AB 2849 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Proposition 65: enforcement.

Summary
The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, an initiative measure approved by the voters as Proposition 65 at the November 4, 1986, statewide general election, prohibits a person, in the course of doing business, from knowingly and intentionally exposing any individual to a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without giving a specified warning, or from knowingly discharging or releasing such a chemical into water, or into or onto land and passing into any source of drinking water, except as specified. The act defines "person in the course of doing business" to exclude persons employing fewer than 10 employees in that person's business. The act imposes civil penalties upon persons who violate those prohibitions, and provides for the enforcement of those prohibitions by the Attorney General, a district attorney, or specified city attorneys or prosecutors, and by any person in the public interest. The act authorizes a person, acting in the public interest, to bring an action to enforce the requirements of the act if that person has given a notice of violation to the Attorney General, the district attorney and a city attorney or prosecutor in whose jurisdiction the violation is alleged to have occurred, and the alleged violator, 60 days before the commencement of the action and neither the Attorney General nor a district attorney nor a city attorney or prosecutor has commenced and is diligently prosecuting an action against the alleged violator. The act provides that it may be amended by a statute, passed by a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature, to further its purposes. This bill would revise the definition of "person in the course of doing business" to include a person employing fewer than 10 employees on terms and conditions as that person states in writing to a person giving the above-described notice and the Attorney General. This bill would find and declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Jun 2020
Assembly Passage
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 21, 2020 Last action Jun 23, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 9, 2020

How they voted

75–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 78
Jun 9, 2020
D Democratic60
57 Yea 3
95% Yea
I Independent1
1 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican17
17 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
13
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Jun 9, 2020
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-3)
assembly
Jun 8, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4729.)
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 2).
lower
May 14, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 24, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 22, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
Feb 21, 2020
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Ed Chau
Ed Chau
DDemocratic
CA
49