Remote court reporting.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a superior court to appoint official court reporters and specifies the fees for court reporting services. This bill would prohibit courts from using remote court reporting, as defined, to produce the record of any court proceedings and from expending any funds to purchase equipment or software to facilitate the use of remote court reporting. Notwithstanding these prohibitions, the bill would authorize, until January 1, 2022, the Santa Clara Superior Court to conduct a pilot project to study the potential use of remote court reporting to make the verbatim record of certain court proceedings that include child support and misdemeanor cases. The bill would require, if the Santa Clara Superior Court elects to conduct the pilot project, the remote court reporting to be performed only by official reporters who meet specified qualifications that include having 5 years of courtroom experience. The bill would require the presiding judge of the Santa Clara Superior Court to appoint a committee to prepare a report to the Legislature on the results of the pilot project and would require the committee's report to be presented to the Legislature within 6 months of the conclusion of the pilot project. The bill would require the pilot project to terminate no later than December 31, 2020.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Jan 23, 2019
Signed Oct 2, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2019 · Assembly May 9, 2019
How they voted
40–0
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 9, 2019
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Oct 2, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3470.).
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (September 11).
lower
Sep 10, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2700.).
upper
Sep 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 19, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 22, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1587.)
lower
May 1, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 3, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and P. & C.P.
lower
Jan 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mark Stone
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 253
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 253. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline