Endangered species: candidate species: petitions: takings.
Summary
The California Endangered Species Act requires the Fish and Game Commission to establish a list of endangered species and a list of threatened species and to add a species to, or remove a species from, either list if it finds, upon the receipt of sufficient scientific information, and based solely upon the best available scientific information, that the action is warranted. The act requires a petition for the listing or delisting of a species to include, at a minimum, sufficient scientific information that the petitioned action may be warranted, including information regarding the population trend, range, distribution, abundance, and life history of the species, the factors affecting the ability of the population to survive and reproduce, and the degree and immediacy of the threat. The act requires the commission to accept a petition for consideration if the commission finds that the petition provides sufficient information to indicate that the petitioned action may be warranted. If a petition accepted for consideration proposes to add a species to either list, the act requires the commission to publish a notice that the species is a candidate species. The act establishes procedures and timelines for the review of an accepted petition for a candidate species. Under the act, the commission may authorize the taking of any candidate species, subject to terms and conditions it prescribes and based on the best available scientific information, if the take is consistent with the act. This bill would require the commission to accept a petition for consideration concurrent with a taking if the commission finds that the petition provides sufficient information to indicate that the petitioned action may be warranted, but the geographic proliferation of the species may lead to significant economic hardship or an impact on critical infrastructure during the above-described review of an accepted petition, and if a preponderance of the evidence presented in the petition shows there is no direct threat to the species that would lead to its decline during that period. The bill would also make conforming changes. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2020
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 18, 2019
Last action Jul 2, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly May 22, 2019
How they voted
57–2
Passed · 18 other
Total votes 77
May 22, 2019
D
Democratic59
74% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican17
70% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Jul 2, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 30, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 27, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 29, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
May 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 2. Page 1790.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 8, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 29, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Feb 7, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Jan 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 21.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 235
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 235. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline