Pharmacy benefit management.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. A willful violation of those provisions is a crime. Existing law requires health care service plans that cover prescription drug benefits and contract with pharmacy providers and pharmacy benefit managers to meet specified requirements, including requiring pharmacy benefit managers with whom they contract to register with the department and exercise good faith and fair dealing, among other requirements. Existing law provides for the registration and regulation of pharmacy benefit managers, as defined, that contract with health care service plans to manage their prescription drug coverage. Under existing law, a pharmacy benefit manager is required to submit specified information to the department to apply to register with the department. This bill would require a pharmacy benefit manager to, beginning October 1, 2021, annually report specified information to the department regarding the covered drugs dispensed at a pharmacy and specified information about the pharmacy benefit manager's revenue, expenses, health care service plan contracts, the scope of services provided to the health care service plan, and the number of enrollees that the pharmacy benefit manager serves. The bill would require the department to compile this reported information and make the report publicly available, as specified, but would exempt records other than the report from public disclosure. The bill would include in the requirements that health care service plans are required to impose on a pharmacy benefit manager with which they contract, the requirement that the pharmacy benefit manager comply with these reporting requirements. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2020
Last action May 5, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
0
Committee
3
May 5, 2020
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
Apr 24, 2020
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
Feb 19, 2020
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JW
Jim Wood
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2348
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2348. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline