Parole.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were not imprisoned for a violent felony, a serious felony, or an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, and who have been on parole for a period of 6 months, be discharged from parole unless the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation recommends to the Board of Parole Hearings that the person should be retained, and the board, for good cause, determines that the person is to be retained. Existing law additionally requires specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were imprisoned for a serious felony or an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, and who have been on parole continuously for one year since release from confinement, to be similarly discharged from parole. Finally, existing law requires that specified persons who have been released on parole from state prison who were imprisoned for a violent felony, and who have been released on parole for a period not exceeding 3 years and have been on parole continuously for 2 years since release from confinement, or who have been released on parole for a period not exceeding 5 years and have been on parole continuously for 3 years since release from confinement, be similarly discharged from parole. This bill would create a program under which the length of a parolee's period of parole could be reduced through credits earned by successfully completing specified education, training, or treatment programs, or by participating in volunteer service, while adhering to the conditions of parole. The bill would make this program inapplicable to a person who is required to register as a sex offender. The bill would, if AB 1304 is enacted, additionally require this program to award credits for participation in substance abuse treatment programs, as specified. (2) Under existing law, an inmate is released to the county of their residence before incarceration or, when the interest of public safety is best served, to another location specified by the Board of Parole Hearings. Existing regulations prohibit a parolee from traveling more than 50 miles from their residence without the approval of a parole agent. The bill would also increase the 50-mile travel restriction for a parolee who successfully participates in the parole credit program, subject to certain restrictions. The bill would require the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Board of Parole Hearings to adopt regulations to carry out this program, as specified. This bill would, as a condition of continued state funding, prohibit any entity that receives state funds and provides services and programs in the fields of education, job training, workforce placement, health, or housing, from denying access to services or programs to a person on the basis that the person is currently or previously has been on parole or postrelease community supervision.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Assembly Passage
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Aug 2020
Vetoed
Sep 2020
Introduced Feb 18, 2020
Vetoed Sep 30, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2020 · Assembly Jun 15, 2020
How they voted
31–4
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2020
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican9
55% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
12
Committee
8
Amendments
8
Sep 30, 2020
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 31, 2020
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 63. Noes 0. Page 5426.).
lower
Aug 30, 2020
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 5.).
upper
Aug 25, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 20, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 20, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 20).
upper
Aug 17, 2020
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 8, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 1, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 15, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 0. Page 4856.)
lower
Jun 10, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 4747.)
lower
Jun 4, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Jun 3, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 7.) (June 3).
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 20, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (May 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 24, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 19, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Kevin McCarty
DDemocratic
Co
Marie Waldron
RRepublican
Co
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2342
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2342. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline