Information privacy: personal health record information: software or hardware.
Summary
Existing law, the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, generally prohibits a provider of health care, a health care service plan, or a contractor from disclosing medical information regarding a patient of the provider of health care or an enrollee or subscriber of a health care service plan without first obtaining an authorization, except as otherwise specified. Existing law defines "medical information" for purposes of these provisions to mean certain individually identifiable health information in possession of or derived from a provider of health care, among others. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions that results in economic loss or personal injury to a patient punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would define "personal health record information" for purposes of the act to mean individually identifiable information, in electronic or physical form, about an individual's mental or physical condition that is collected by a commercial internet website, online service, or product that is used by an individual and that collects the individual's personal health record information through a direct measurement of an individual's mental or physical condition or through user input regarding an individual's mental or physical condition. The bill would provide that a business that offers personal health record software or hardware to a consumer, in order to make information available to an individual or provider of health care at the request of the individual or provider of health care, for purposes of allowing the individual to manage their information, or for the diagnosis, treatment, or management of a medical condition of the individual, shall be deemed to be a provider of health care subject to the requirements of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act. Because the bill would expand the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Jul 2020
Assembly Passage
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2020
Last action Jul 14, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 10, 2020
How they voted
52–10
Passed · 16 other
Total votes 78
Jun 10, 2020
D
Democratic60
83% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican17
47% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
12
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Jul 1, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 10, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 10. Page 4760.)
lower
Jun 3, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (June 3).
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 19, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 17, 2020
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 24, 2020
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 15, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ed Chau
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2280
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2280. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline