Crimes: assessments: restitution: ability to pay.
Summary
Existing law, in addition to restitution paid to a victim of a crime, requires the court to impose a separate and additional restitution fine of $150 to $1,000 for a misdemeanor and $300 to $10,000 for a felony unless the court finds compelling and extraordinary reasons for not doing so. Existing law prohibits a court from considering a defendant's inability to pay as a compelling and extraordinary reason not to impose the restitution fine. Existing law imposes an assessment of $30 on every conviction for a misdemeanor or felony and $35 on each infraction to ensure and maintain adequate funding for court facilities. Existing law also imposes an assessment of $40 on every conviction for a criminal offense to assist in funding court operations. Existing case law holds that due process of law requires a court to conduct an ability to pay hearing and ascertain the defendant's present ability to pay before it imposes these court facilities and court operations assessments or executes a restitution fine. This bill would instead make a defendants inability to pay a fine a compelling and extraordinary reason for a court to not impose a restitution fine upon a conviction of a misdemeanor or felony. The bill would require the court to impose the court facility and court operation assessments unless the court determines that the defendant does not have the ability to pay.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2019
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 17, 2019
Last action Feb 3, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
5
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Mar 20, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Feb 26, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (February 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 4, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 18, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 227
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 227. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline