AB 2165 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Electronic filing and service of documents.

Summary
Existing law authorizes a trial court to adopt local rules permitting electronic filing of documents, subject to specified conditions, including the conditions that if a document that is electronically filed in a civil action requires the signature of a person, not under penalty of perjury, the document is deemed to have been signed by the person who filed the document electronically and that any payment processing fee charged by the court, an electronic filing manager, or electronic filing service provider shall not exceed the costs incurred in processing the payment. Existing law authorizes a court to require electronic filing and service in civil actions, subject to rules adopted by the Judicial Council permitting mandatory electronic filing and service in specified civil actions, the conditions described above, and additional specified conditions, including the conditions that the court charge fees of no more than the actual cost of the electronic filing and service of the documents and that the court shall waive any fees charged if the court deems a waiver appropriate. This bill would instead provide that a document described above shall be deemed filed by the person who signed the document if either the filer is the signer of the document or the document has been signed pursuant to procedures established in the California Rules of Court. The bill would create additional conditions trial courts would be required to satisfy when adopting local rules permitting electronic filing of documents, as defined. The bill would require courts, electronic filing service providers, and electronic filing managers to send notices of receipt or rejection to parties or persons filing electronic documents, as specified. The bill would extend the statute of limitations for a cause of action asserted in a complaint or cross-complaint if a complaint or cross-complaint is rejected for filing, as specified. The bill would extend the condition that the court charge fees of no more than the actual cost of the electronic filing and service of the documents to actions in which electronic filing is permitted by local rule. The bill would require a court, electronic service provider, or electronic filing manager to waive fees for electronic filing if a party has been granted a fee waiver and to waive fees associated with electronic filing of specified types of documents, including a filing exempt from the payment of filing fees under any other law. The bill would prohibit an electronic filing service provider or an electronic filing manager from seeking payment of waived fees from the court. The bill would make technical and conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1010.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure proposed by SB 1146 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1146 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Aug 2020
Assembly Passage
Jun 2020
Senate Passage
Aug 2020
Signed into Law
Sep 2020
Introduced Feb 11, 2020 Signed Sep 28, 2020
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2020 · Assembly Aug 31, 2020

How they voted

350
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 30, 2020
D Democratic26
26 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican9
9 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
14
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Sep 28, 2020
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2020
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Aug 31, 2020
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5442.).
lower
Aug 30, 2020
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 26, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 25, 2020
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 13, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jul 31, 2020
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 23, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 8, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 4726.)
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 2).
lower
May 12, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (May 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 17, 2020
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 12, 2020
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 20, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 12, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors

Sponsors