AB 2129 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Civil procedure: special motion to strike.

Summary
Existing law subjects to a special motion to strike a cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of that person's right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. Existing law requires any party who files a special motion to strike, or an opposition to a special motion to strike, to transmit to the Judicial Council, promptly upon filing, a copy of the endorsed, filed caption page of the motion or opposition, a copy of any related notice of appeal or petition for a writ, and a conformed copy of any order issued, as specified, including any order granting or denying a special motion to strike, discovery, or fees. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to maintain a public record of the information transmitted to it, as described above, for at least 3 years. This bill would repeal the Judicial Council transmittal requirements and the Judicial Council's corresponding duty to maintain a public record of these transmittals for 3 years.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2020 Last action Feb 20, 2020
Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
3
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Feb 20, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 11, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Ed Chau
Ed Chau
DDemocratic
CA
49