Pet store operators: crimes.
Summary
Existing law, the Pet Store Animal Care Act, requires pet store operators, as defined, to comply with laws governing, among other things, the care of animals in pet stores. Existing law makes a pet store operator who violates these provisions guilty of a misdemeanor, except as otherwise provided. Existing law prohibits a pet store operator from selling a live dog, cat, or rabbit in a pet store unless the animal was obtained from a public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, humane society shelter, or rescue group, as specified. Existing law also requires each pet store to comply with specified documentation, recordkeeping, and other requirements with respect to these animals. Existing law exempts a pet store operator who violates those provisions from criminal prosecution, but imposes a specified civil penalty upon that pet store operator, and provides that each animal that is offered for sale in violation of these provisions constitutes a separate violation. This bill would revise that prohibition by excluding a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, humane society shelter, or rescue group from the list of organizations from which a pet store operator may obtain a live dog, cat, or rabbit for purposes of selling that animal. The bill would remove the exemption from criminal prosecution for a pet store operator who violates that prohibition or the other requirements, thereby creating new crimes. The bill would also provide that each animal that is offered for sale per day, rather than each animal that is offered for sale, in violation of those provisions constitutes a separate violation. By creating new crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 6, 2020
Last action Feb 20, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
3
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Feb 20, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 7, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Patrick O'Donnell
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2117
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2117. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline