Toxicological testing on dogs.
Summary
Existing law prohibits manufacturers and contract testing facilities from using traditional animal test methods within the state for which an appropriate alternative test method has been scientifically validated and recommended by the Inter-Agency Coordinating Committee for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and adopted, as specified. Existing law excepts certain animal tests from these provisions, including animal tests performed for the purpose of medical research. Existing law provides that the exclusive remedy for a violation of these provisions is a civil action for injunctive relief brought by, among others, the Attorney General and makes a violation of these provisions punishable by a specified civil penalty. This bill would prohibit a contract testing facility from conducting a canine toxicological experiment, defined as any test or study of any duration that seeks to determine the effect of the application or exposure of any amount of a chemical substance on a dog, unless the experiment is conducted for specified purposes, including medical research or to comply with federal requirements pertaining to the approval or maintenance of a medical device. The bill would provide that the exclusive remedy for a violation of these provisions is a civil action for injunctive relief brought by, among others, the Attorney General and makes a violation of these provisions punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed $5,000 for each day that each dog is used in a canine toxicological experiment. The bill would define various terms for purposes of carrying out these provisions.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2020
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 4, 2020
Last action Jun 3, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Jun 3, 2020
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Jun 2, 2020
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 12, 2020
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 11, 2020
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 10, 2020
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (March 10).
lower
Feb 14, 2020
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 5, 2020
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2059
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2059. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline