Local government: properties eligible to claim or receiving a welfare exemption.
Summary
The Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, after a community facilities district has been created and authorized to levy specified special taxes, authorizes the legislative body, by ordinance, to levy the special taxes at the rate and apportion them in the manner specified in the resolution forming the community facilities district. The act requires properties or entities of the state, federal, or local governments, except as otherwise provided, to be exempt from the special tax. This bill would also require property receiving a welfare exemption, as specified, to be exempt from the special tax. The bill would require this exemption to apply to taxes imposed by an ordinance adopted on or after January 1, 2020. The Planning and Zoning Law provides that any action by a city, county, city and county, or other local governmental agency in this state is null and void if it denies to any individual or group of individuals the enjoyment of residence, landownership, tenancy, or any other land use in this state because of, among other things, the method of financing of any residential development of the individual or group of individuals. That law also prohibits a city, county, city and county, or other local governmental agency from prohibiting or discriminating against a residential development or emergency shelter because of, among other things, the method of financing. This bill would define "method of financing" for the purposes described above to include the eligibility to claim a welfare exemption, as specified. The Housing Accountability Act, which is part of the Planning and Zoning Law, prohibits a local agency from disapproving, or conditioning approval in a manner that renders infeasible, a housing development project for very low, low-, or moderate-income households or an emergency shelter unless the local agency makes one of specified findings, including that the housing development project or emergency shelter as proposed would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety, and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable, as provided, or rendering the development of the emergency shelter financially infeasible. The act defines "specific, adverse impact" for this purpose and prohibits inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan land use designation from constituting a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety. This bill would additionally prohibit the eligibility to claim a welfare exemption, as specified, from constituting a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 65589.5 of the Government Code proposed by SB 330 and SB 592 to be operative only if this bill and either or both SB 330 and SB 592 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Sep 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Signed Oct 9, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 11, 2019 · Assembly May 2, 2019
How they voted
37–0
Passed
Total votes 37
Sep 11, 2019
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Oct 9, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3501.).
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2858.).
upper
Sep 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Sep 4, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the measure be returned to Senate Floor for consideration. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (September 4)
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(b).
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(b).
upper
Aug 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jul 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
May 16, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1464.)
lower
Apr 11, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 18, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1743
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1743. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline