Developmental services: fair hearings.
Summary
The Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act requires the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Under existing law, the regional centers purchase needed services for individuals with developmental disabilities through approved service providers or arrange for those services through other publicly funded agencies. Existing law requires a service agency, defined, in part, as a developmental center or regional center, to have a fair hearing procedure that meets prescribed requirements, including adequate notice standards, to resolve conflicts between the service provider and recipients of, or applicants for, service. Existing law provides that adequate notice be sent by certified mail to the applicant or recipient and the authorized representative in specified circumstances, including if the service agency makes certain decisions, such as to reduce, to terminate, or to change services described in an individual program plan, without the mutual consent of the service recipient or authorized representative. This bill would instead require the service agency to provide adequate notice by first-class mail, certified mail, or electronic mail, as prescribed, to the above-specified individuals if the service agency makes specified decisions relating to services, irrespective of whether the service agency makes this decision without mutual consent of the service recipient or authorized representative. The bill would make technical, conforming changes and other nonsubstantive changes.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Last action Jun 29, 2020
Floor votes · Assembly May 22, 2019
How they voted
74–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 77
May 22, 2019
D
Democratic59
94% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican17
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Jul 2, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 4, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 29, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 22, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1830.)
lower
May 15, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 15).
lower
Apr 24, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 28, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eduardo Garcia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1643
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1643. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline