Regional transportation plans: traffic signal optimization plans.
Summary
Existing law requires designated transportation planning agencies to, among other things, prepare and adopt a regional transportation plan. Existing law requires a regional transportation plan to include a policy element, an action element, a financial element, and, if the transportation planning agency is also a metropolitan planning organization, a sustainable communities strategy. Existing law requires each transportation planning agency to consider and incorporate into its regional transportation plan the transportation plans of cities, counties, districts, private organizations, and state and federal agencies, as appropriate. Existing law designates the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) as the regional transportation planning agency for the 9-county San Francisco Bay area, with various powers and duties relative to transportation planning, programming, and funding. This bill would authorize a city located within the jurisdiction of MTC to develop and implement a traffic signal optimization plan intended to reduce travel times, the number of stops, and fuel use. The bill would also require the Department of Transportation and a city that develops a traffic signal optimization plan pursuant to these provisions to coordinate on any adjustments to traffic signals owned or operated by the department.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Aug 2019
Assembly Passage
Apr 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Signed Oct 8, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2019 · Assembly Apr 25, 2019
How they voted
37–0
Passed
Total votes 37
Sep 3, 2019
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
12
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Oct 8, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 5, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3027.).
lower
Sep 3, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 3, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2449.).
upper
Aug 21, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 12, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 27, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 25, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on EQ. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 5, 2019
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 8, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and EQ.
upper
Apr 25, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1362.)
lower
Apr 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Apr 8, 2019
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 18, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tim Grayson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1633
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1633. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline