State highways: Hollywood Central Park: environmental quality.
Summary
Existing law gives the Department of Transportation full possession and control of the state highway system. This bill would require the department to review and approve the Hollywood Central Park project, which is a freeway cap project, as provided. The bill would require the department to grant to the City of Los Angeles encroachment permits that are necessary for the construction and operation of the project. The bill would require the department to transfer the ownership of any structure built pursuant to the project and any associated air space rights to the City of Los Angeles. The bill would impose duties on the City of Los Angeles, Department of Recreation and Parks, regarding the review of the project by the department, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA authorizes a person to bring an action or proceeding to seek judicial review of the decision of the lead agency made pursuant to CEQA. This bill would prohibit a person from bringing an action or proceeding to seek judicial review of a public agency's action or decision made pursuant to CEQA relating to the Hollywood Central Park project. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Hollywood Central Park project. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Last action Feb 3, 2020
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
0
Committee
3
Feb 3, 2020
Assembly · Failed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Jan 31, 2020
Assembly · Failed
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
Apr 1, 2019
Assembly · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
Mar 28, 2019
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and NAT. RES.
Feb 23, 2019
Assembly · Reported by committee
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
Feb 22, 2019
Assembly · Introduced
Introduced. To print.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Bloom
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1610
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1610. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline