Hazardous substances: contaminated property: fentanyl cleanup.
Summary
Existing law provides that a person who is found to have operated a site for the purpose of manufacturing an illegal controlled substance or the precursor of an illegal controlled substance is the generator of a hazardous substance at, or released from, the site that is subject to removal action by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. Existing law, the Methamphetamine Contaminated Property Cleanup Act of 2005, requires a local health officer to take specified actions after receiving notification from a law enforcement agency of potential contamination of, or of known or suspected contamination of, property by a methamphetamine laboratory activity, including, among other actions, posting a written notice in a prominent location on the premises of the property. The act requires a property owner who receives an order that the property owned by that person is contaminated by a methamphetamine laboratory activity, a property owner who owns property that is the subject of an order, and a person occupying the property to immediately vacate the affected unit. The act requires the property owner to retain a methamphetamine laboratory site remediation firm that is an authorized contractor meeting certain requirements, as described, to remediate the contamination caused by methamphetamine laboratory activity. A violation of certain provisions of the act is subject to specified civil penalties. This bill would rename the act the Methamphetamine or Fentanyl Contaminated Property Cleanup Act and would additionally apply all of its provisions to fentanyl contaminated property, including property owner site assessment, remediation, cleanup, and financial liability, civil penalties, and local health officer responsibilities. By imposing additional duties on local health officers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The act, for purposes of determining whether a property contaminated by methamphetamine laboratory activity is safe for human occupancy, provides a specified standard for maximum methamphetamine levels and provides additional standards for maximum levels of lead and mercury if the methamphetamine laboratory activity included the use of lead or mercury compounds. The act makes these standards inoperative on the date that the Department of Toxic Substances Control, in consultation with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, adopts a health-based target remediation standard for methamphetamine to determine when a property contaminated by methamphetamine laboratory activity only is safe for human occupancy. This bill would make those standards inoperative instead on the date that a state or federal agency adopts that standard. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jul 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Signed into Law
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Signed Oct 9, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2019 · Assembly May 23, 2019
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Sep 6, 2019
D
Democratic29
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Oct 9, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3248.).
lower
Sep 6, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 6, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2607.).
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 30, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 30).
upper
Jul 1, 2019
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 20, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 6, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
May 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1902.)
lower
May 16, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 8, 2019
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 10, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 9). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Mar 18, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1596
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1596. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline