Unfair Practices Act.
Summary
The Unfair Practices Act makes various practices unlawful and provides that any person who engages, has engaged, or proposes to engage in unfair competition is liable for a civil penalty. That act specifies who is authorized to bring an action to enforce it, including a city attorney of any city having a population in excess of 750,000. That act requires 12 of the penalty collected to be paid to the treasurer of the city in which the judgment was entered and the other 12 to the treasurer of the county in which the judgment was entered if the action was brought by a city attorney or city prosecutor. This bill would instead require the penalty collected to be paid to the treasurer of the city whose attorney brought the action if the action is brought by a city attorney of a city having a population in excess of 750,000, unless a county agency participated in the prelitigation investigation of the action, in which case the bill would require 12 of the penalty collected to be paid to the treasurer of the city in which the judgment was entered, and 12 to the treasurer of the county in which the judgment was entered. The bill would provide that those provisions do not apply to a penalty collected by the Los Angeles City Attorney's office on or before January 1, 2021, and would further require that on or before January 1, 2021, 12 of a penalty collected by the Los Angeles City Attorney's office be paid to the treasurer of the County of Los Angeles. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Sep 2019
Vetoed
Oct 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Vetoed Oct 12, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Sep 5, 2019 · Assembly May 9, 2019
How they voted
27–10
Passed
Total votes 37
Sep 5, 2019
D
Democratic28
96% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
4
Amendments
5
Jan 21, 2020
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 12, 2019
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 18. Page 3158.).
lower
Sep 6, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 8 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 5, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 12. Page 2570.).
upper
Aug 15, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 19, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 18).
upper
May 22, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 15. Page 1582.)
lower
May 2, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 1, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (April 30).
lower
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1477
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1477. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline