AB 1380 California Assembly · 2019-2020 Regular Session

Premarital agreements: enforcement.

Summary
Existing law establishes conditions under which a premarital agreement is not enforceable, including when the party against whom enforcement is sought proves that party did not execute the agreement voluntarily. Existing law, effective January 1, 2002, deems that a premarital agreement was not executed voluntarily unless the court finds, among other things, that the party against whom enforcement is sought (1) was represented by independent legal counsel at the time of signing the agreement or was advised to seek legal counsel and waived representation and (2) had at least 7 days between being first presented with the agreement and being advised to seek counsel and the time the agreement was signed. This bill would require the advisement to seek independent legal counsel described above to be made at least 7 days before the final agreement is signed. The bill would state that this provision is declaratory of existing law. The bill would also provide, with respect to premarital agreements executed on or after January 1, 2020, that the agreement may not be deemed voluntary unless the party against whom enforcement is sought had at least 7 days between being first presented with the final agreement and signing the agreement, regardless of whether the party is represented by legal counsel.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Jul 2019
Signed into Law
Aug 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019 Signed Aug 30, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Jul 11, 2019 · Assembly May 9, 2019

How they voted

330
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 34
Jul 11, 2019
D Democratic26
26 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican8
7 Yea 1
87% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
4
Amendments
4
Aug 30, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 12, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2661.).
lower
Jul 11, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2055.).
upper
Jun 19, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
May 22, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 9, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1570.)
lower
May 1, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Mar 14, 2019
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jay Obernolte
Jay Obernolte
RRepublican
CA
33